In a case decided in late February 2014, Cunningham v. State the Indiana Court of Appeals an Officer pulled over a driver for having a missing tail lamp. When the driver was surprised the tail lamp was missing, he requested that he be able to see the missing tail lamp for himself. The Officer said that the driver could go see for himself, but that the Officer would Pat Down search the driver if the driver got out of the car. The driver agreed and was searched by a Pat Down. The driver was in possession of marijuana.
The Court of Appeals, by a split decision, reversed this trial court and said that the Pat Down search was illegal. The Court noted the complete lack of any reason why the Officer felt he was in danger. And the Court held that the "consent' given by the driver to the Officer for the Pat Down search was was not true consent but merely submission to the police authority - which is actually the absence of freely and voluntarily consent.
The Court in Cunningham have struck a huge victory for the everyday person to be free from searches by Police. Indiana Search and Seizure law is complicated. If you have an issue with search and seizure, please be sure to contact a knowledgeable trial attorney. If you or someone you care about has been charged with a crime please contact Attorney Lopez at (317) 632-3642 or through email.